
Originally Posted by
Visiblegaming
Why the false claims against me?
1- I said Jesus isn't God, i did not say the codex sinaiticus doesn't talk about "the son" because lots of prophets are called son of God in the codex.
2- No immaculate conceptions? ...I'm Muslim, i believe Jesus was born off a virgin, so again why this claim against me?
3- I said Jesus was not killed, Im a Muslim i believe he was crucified -.-, show me where it says he died, like king james version does.
3- your only valid point about me. BUT
The bible was written after Jesus going up to heaven, so the people who write it could have believed it was truly Jesus that died as many Christians did. The Quran was sent down by angel Gabriel and was not written by man like the bible was, read this.
"“They did not kill him, nor did they crucify him, but they thought they did.” (Quran 4:156) “God lifted him up to His presence. God is Almighty, All-Wise” (Quran 4:157)
[Please make valid points about what i say or atleast qoute it, not benign to just make things up :/]
First off, why would I make this thread if you didn't make any of these claims. I can personally go through every one of these threads, and find where you made the claims.
If they are edited within this day by you,
that really just incriminates you.
Secondly..are you kidding me?
I can show you in multiple passages where it describes his death.
Like how the Roman soldier speared Christ,in the rib
but only blood and water flowed,
thus proving the prophecy that not a bone in his body would be broken..even in death.
The Angel that came down from heaven to take Jesus's body, which a Roman soldier and both Mary's witnessed. The Angel told both Mary's To meet The RESURRECTED Jesus in Galilee, and they both witnessed him.
You really need to read the bible before making claims against it.
and just stop believing every Muslim on every website that speaks against Christianity.
I would also like to make this point.
There is over 140 pages of preserved New Testament that dates back to 200 AD.
It is word for word accurate to the NT scriptures we have today.
These fragments of NT predate the codex over 200 years..
But because it is not in it's entireity it is not considered a Bible.
The Codex is looked upon the same way..
though it is very old and well preserved,
you will see that there are parts missing,
some pieces in the OT and NT are either fragmented or the words are faded.