We need to make some changes.

Yes and NO. Yes because..So the noobs won't just be going away freely. No because there will be millions of useless threads.

then there wont be as much hackers and if someone spams then you ban them. simple

NO NO NO maybe my opinion will change when my posts r over 50 lol

banning all those people would be a lot of work for the mods and admins
im sure if that would be the case there would easly be 100+ bans a week and after the next patch detects the pub hacks allll the people with 1 post will come back and destroy the forum with spam...
come on dont you think reading threw every single retarded spammers post then banning every single one THEN deleting ALL the new topics that the retarded spammers have made would get to be annoying? -.-

ya toalty 50 posts

Everyone with 50+ posts says yes and everyone with under 50 posts says no

Why?

Cuz all u ppl care about are the hacks and don't even think about how much spam there will be no the hacks are still only 1 post

why should i care if i have 50+ post? i have VIP <.<
and im not really even thinking about the spam...just about the mods and admins..after all the more busy they are monitoring the forum the less time they have to work on making newer and better hacks

But making it 50 post requirement will cause a lot of spam on the forums. Hyperion did this before with the public warrock hacks post requirement, and it caused a lot of spam and flame wars. You have to think of the downside about stuff like these.

can't u just make it were u can only post like 10 or 15 posts a day

more posts=more spam...
personally i think it should be 0 posts for the sake of the forums

meh i say no, 2 much spammage

Howbout you make a thread stating what is spam and what is not spam. And if u spam u get banned. Simple. And im only saying 50+ because i have over 50+ u idiot? Ive been on this site longer than most of u newbs this isnt my only account