Home › Forum › MultiPlayer Game Hacks & Cheats › Combat Arms Hacks & Cheats › Combat Arms Hack Coding / Programming / Source Code › Combat Arms Coding Help & Discussion › Is this method patched or is it just fail coding?
Is this method patched or is it just fail coding?
Is this method patched or is it just fail coding?
Code:
#include <windows.h>
bool IsGameReadyForHook()
{
if( GetModuleHandleA( "d3d9.dll" ) != NULL
&& GetModuleHandleA( "ClientFX.fxd" ) != NULL
&& GetModuleHandleA( "CShell.dll" ) != NULL )
return true;
return false;
}
void __cdecl PushToConsole( const char* szCommand )
{
DWORD *LTClient = ( DWORD* )( 0x3778BFB0 );
void* CONoff = ( void* )*( DWORD* )( *LTClient + 0x208 );
__asm
{
push szCommand;
call CONoff;
add esp, 4;
}
}
void main()
{
while(true)
Sleep(1);
{
//hacks
}
}
DWORD WINAPI dwHackThread(LPVOID)
{
while( !IsGameReadyForHook() )
Sleep(1);
main();
return 0;
}
BOOL WINAPI DllMain ( HMODULE hDll, DWORD dwReason, LPVOID lpReserved )
{
DisableThreadLibraryCalls(hDll);
if ( dwReason == DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH )
{
CreateThread(NULL, NULL, dwHackThread, NULL, NULL, NULL);
}
return TRUE;
}
It always disconnects in game, it didn't disconnect yesterday but it started to do so today.. Any ideas on how to improve this?
Read the sticky...
There is a reason as to why its there.
There is a reason as to why its there.
*cough
old LTC address
and code demon isnt that way ptc command patched?
old LTC address
and code demon isnt that way ptc command patched?
Originally Posted by CodeDemon
Read the sticky...
There is a reason as to why its there.
There is a reason as to why its there.
Originally Posted by HiddenoO
More specific, please.
Originally Posted by HiddenoO
Lmao...fail, never mind I see the problem..
Originally Posted by CodeDemon
Its right there in giant letters at the top of the page READ BEFORE POSTING: WE DON'T NEED ANYMORE OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS... your answer is in that thread.
Originally Posted by CodeDemon
Its right there in giant letters at the top of the page READ BEFORE POSTING: WE DON'T NEED ANYMORE OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS... your answer is in that thread.
READ MY SIG (not to be mean just do it)
i would have to press numpad 0 for 2 seconds to turn on if i did ur sig O.o
That LTClient Address is a spy!
Originally Posted by koolwrench
i would have to press numpad 0 for 2 seconds to turn on if i did ur sig O.o
But the worst thing is that it uses a Sleep statement in a single thread that could probably be doing other things. You might want to find a way to ditch the sleep statement, or create more threads.
Originally Posted by HL-SDK
No - you are wrong. It would turn on as quickly as possible, then when disabled, it would have a holdoff time of 0.2 seconds.
But the worst thing is that it uses a Sleep statement in a single thread that could probably be doing other things. You might want to find a way to ditch the sleep statement, or create more threads.
But the worst thing is that it uses a Sleep statement in a single thread that could probably be doing other things. You might want to find a way to ditch the sleep statement, or create more threads.
Haha, sorry. I should have read your useless signature but I couldn't take the time to. It isn't that I am a slow reader or anything, it is just very trivial code. I was tripped up.
Code:
bool solved = true
Originally Posted by |Drake™|
Code:
bool solved = true
Code:
bool solved = true;
Code:
if(GetAsyncKeyState(VK_CONTROL)<0){
if(solved) {
PushToConsole("SolveQuestion 0");
solved = false;
}else{
PushToConsole("SolveQuestion 1");
solved = true;
}
}
Code:
PushToConsole("SolveQuestion 1");
Code:
lol solved = laugh;
if(choke(VK_CONTROL)<0){
if(solved) {
lmfao("SolveQuestion");
solved = cough;
}else{
lmfao("SolveQuestion"):
solved = laugh;
}
}
Similar Threads
- [Question]Are strifes chams patched or am i just using them incorrectlyBy wolfff in Combat Arms Hacks & Cheats51Last post
- 9Last post
- So is there any possible ways to hack on this new patch V. 1.31?By roylytammy in Vindictus Discussions24Last post
- 4Last post