Having trouble making hacks.

well dark heres a tut for no recoil less spread it was posted like 2 patchs ago not sure if it works but give it a try this was psoted by offbeat ninja

No recoil no spread:
4 Byte

1. Take at your grenade, search for “unknown initial value”
2. Take out your Second weapon(Colt etc.) and search for “Increased”
3. Now take your Main weapon (K2 Ak) and search for “Increased” Again.
4. Now Take your Grenade and search for “Same as first scan”
5. And now you’ll have like 10 addresses
6. Now freeze them too 0.

And is there a way to make the snipes 100% from point blank? Almost like the cross-hair hack. Is that made through CE?

Alright other one is idk, and since theres a new bypass this will work perfect


1. Okay after you got your values of you hacks click 'advanced options'

2. Top left theres a square tab hover over it and it says: Create a standalone Trainer , click it/then click ok on next window

3. click change image and change to w.e u want/ same goes to change icon

4. Name it to anything you want for title

5. under title click the little folder thing and find combatarms.exe in nexon folder. click OK

6. For Process, go to engine.exe

7. Add w.e for text and under it check the 'prevent from reopening' tab

8. to the left its a bix white box. under says 'Add entry' click it.

9. Click the 'add' button

10. Select value you wanna add

11. check the 'only set a value and type value in little white box

12. check the 'allow user to change value' tab if you wanna let them change the value

12. click 'OK' now write the effect in.. and put hotkey to w.e you want

13. After that click 'OK' now your trainer will show the effect/hotkey

14. Repeat for all values

15. after that click Generate Trainer and it will save to ur cheatengine folder to what you named it.

16. Have fun



PS static addresses will appear green in address list when searching values)


100% MADE BUY ANDYKLK2009(rmbr thanks button)

lemme test it out...

Bump.

I really don't want to bump an old thread, but I didn't get the answer that I was looking for. I think this is more productive than making a new thread.