K.e.m strike with every kill

indeed, they just said, go zerk with your hax

Didn't want to start a thread for this and it seemed like the place to ask.

Can you change the care package through address so it only drops K.E.Ms? Or change one of the kill streak care packages like maniac/juggernaut so it drops the K.E.M. instead?


EDIT: I'm only asking because I remember the early days of MW3 with the unlimited UAV and multiple attachments on weapons before it got patched.

I didn't read the complete thread, but there is a method to get the killstreak of the host on a private game (didn't test it online):

The magic words are: pattern scan.
VB.Net-Syntax:
pScan(Startadress, Scanrange in byte, pattern, mask)

I won't give you the function, signature is more than enough.


myaddy += &H24

myaddy is your killstreak-address now.

It may not work online since your player position (between 1 to 18) always differs each match.

still useless unless you are the host and just use CE for the KEM if you truly are that horny on it lol
you just seem to make that post to "brag" to the newer guy's that you use pattern scanning OMG WOW... since you give your syntax but not the function, new people still remain clueless. GJ bro you earned a cookie



for people who want to know what Pattern Scanning (omg not again must be kewl) is google it.
It's also known as sig scan, signature scanning, AOB scan (used in CE) etc

Google

In case my pattern returns the killstreak for the first player, you can get your clientnum (from e.g playernames struct) and add "(Clientnum - 1) * Kemstructsize" to the address you just found before.




When i start coding, i had no knowledge about patternscan (AoB-Scan). Nobody spoonfeeds me.
If you can handle a programming language, you are able to create an own pattern function.
Hint:
- give an address, where the function starts to read
- give a range
- read the adress (as byte, lenght = pattern lenght)
- compare the bytes to your pattern in reference to the mask
- bytes aren't equal? -> exit Loop, increase address by 1, read again
- do it "range"-times.

I did it with two For-Loops.

In my opinion, a working pattern in worthier than this easy function.