The Truth About VAC Detection

It's not funny, dont kidding me please. Im seriously!

So let us say I went to the public hacks section right now, and got the latest undetected pub cheat and used these methods. How long do you think we'd be able to use this public hack without high risks of VAC ban? And if these programs change the signature that VAC detects entirely, is it possible that you could use a VAC detected cheat (which would mean the signature for the blocks has been found out if i am understanding this correctly?) and use these programs to change the signature entirely to have VAC not detect it? And if no, then why? Also are the signatures that these programs change of the cheats static? Meaning that if 15 of us use Enigma on the same cheat then we will all be using the same cheat signature? Or does enigma randomly generate the signature every time you use it? Just curiosity on how all this works before I look into buying. Thanks for the info

Nice post I learned a lot about VAC from this. Quick question though, I read from a public hack that encrypting the contents of a file through the properties setting makes it safer? Is this true and why?

Excellent article, Hash Changer bit was funny to see.

so if I Copy&Paste hack from some source
update offsets. add junk code, add some stuff, use VMProtect
it will be undetected?
Thanks.

Yes that is correct.

Edit: If you do not screw up adding junk code.

What about TrueCrypt? Any advise about that ?

Thanks for this, but from my mind, i think HashChanger really helps to cheats. Thats all.

great explanation!!