NOMENU Hack problem!

Hi,

use this:

injecting your DLL into an injector...
You fail copy pasting homo ******

Lol ofcourse will it fail when you inject a .dll in an injector. You need to put the .dll in injector and INJECT the injector in a process.

shut up ******s he made that hack

No he didn't, this is a very old source 2+ months, he copypasted it from gbastard.net forums, PM me for link if you don't believe (can't post rival links here)

I have the same problem i made my hack.. building and all goes right. but when i want to inject the hack it says Faild to Inject. but i send my hack to other coders they said the hack was good but it doesnt iject wats the problem?

Code :

#include <windows.h>
#include <stdio.h>

//Address\\

#define Playerpointer 0x00CC4778
#define Serverpointer 0x00BCE110
#define Fast_Ammo 0x00B04250
#define Fast_Health 0x00B04254
#define Fast_Repair 0x00B04258
#define Fast_Flag 0x00B0425C
#define No_Spread 0x00B042B0
#define Speed 0x009A7E04
#define Stamina_OffSet 0x10
#define NoRecoil_1_OffSet 0x0
#define NoRecoil_2_OffSet 0x4
#define NoRecoil_3_OffSet 0x8
#define OFS_X 0x23C
#define OFS_Y 0x244
#define OFS_Z 0x240
#define Slot5_OffSet 0xE0ABC
#define NFD_Player_OffSet 0x308
#define Premium_OffSet 0x374

DWORD *ingame= (DWORD*)Playerpointer;
DWORD *outgame= (DWORD*)Serverpointer;

//Codes\\

void FastAll ()
{
DWORD dwPlayerPtr = *(DWORD*)Playerpointer;
if(dwPlayerPtr != 0)
{
*(float*)Fast_Repair = 10;
*(float*)Fast_Health = 5;
*(float*)Fast_Flag = 10;
*(float*)Fast_Ammo = 5;
}}

void speedon ()
{
if(GetAsyncKeyState(VK_NUMPAD1) &1)
{
*(float*)(Speed) = 300;
}
}

void speedoff ()
{
if(GetAsyncKeyState(VK_NUMPAD0) &1)
{
*(float*)(Speed) = 100;
}
}

void jump ()
{
if(GetAsyncKeyState(VK_CONTROL) &1)
{
DWORD dwPlayerPtr = *(DWORD*)Playerpointer;
if(dwPlayerPtr != 0)
{
*(float*)(dwPlayerPtr+OFS_Z) = 1000;
}
}
}

void stamina ()
{
DWORD dwPlayerPtr = *(DWORD*)Playerpointer;
if(dwPlayerPtr != 0)
{
*(float*)(dwPlayerPtr+Stamina_OffSet) = 100;
}
}

void norecoil ()
{
DWORD dwPlayerPtr = *(DWORD*)Playerpointer;
if(dwPlayerPtr != 0)
{
*(float*)(dwPlayerPtr+0x00) = 0;
*(float*)(dwPlayerPtr+0x04) = 0;
*(float*)(dwPlayerPtr+0x08) = 0;
}
}

void nfd ()
{
DWORD dwPlayerPtr = *(DWORD*)Playerpointer;
if(dwPlayerPtr != 0)
{
*(float*)(dwPlayerPtr+NFD_Player_OffSet) = -20000;
}
}

void premium ()
{
DWORD dwPlayerPtr = *(DWORD*)Serverpointer;
if(dwPlayerPtr != 0)
{
*(long*)(dwPlayerPtr+Premium_OffSet) = 3, 10;
}
}

void spread ()
{
*(float*) No_Spread = 0;
}

void Slots5 ()
{
DWORD dwPlayerPtr = *(DWORD*)Serverpointer;
if(dwPlayerPtr != 0)
{
*(long*)(dwPlayerPtr+Slot5_OffSet) = 1;
}
}

//hackthread\\

void HackThread()
{
for(;; )
{
if(*ingame)
{
jump();
nfd();
premium();
spread();
norecoil();
stamina();
speedon();
speedoff();
FastAll();
Slots5();
}
if(*outgame)
{
premium();
Slots5();
}
}
Sleep(200);
}

BOOL WINAPI DllMain(HINSTANCE hModule, DWORD dwReason, LPVOID lpReserved)
{
if(dwReason == DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH)
{
CreateThread(0, 0, (LPTHREAD_START_ROUTINE)HackThread, 0, 0, 0); //create the hackthread
}
return TRUE;
}

The problem is that you fags leeched it so don't expect any help from any coder around here...

If you want a quick reply..

You should use namespaces to wrap global variables(I would avoid global variables unless they're really required.). You should be using a proper nameing convention. It'd be ideal if all the hack routines were stored in a class(which also contained all the addresses as constants). Your macros should be in a header, and lastly, you should be using DirectInput, or other libraries to gather input. Gathering input from the callback is slow, it's even slower making a million calls to the same API.

If your going to post code snippets for us to fix, give us compile\link errors, or details on what's going wrong. Make sure the code is well formatted (I.E Indents), variables follow the proper naming convention(if you're using one, and the code is large enough to require it), and that the code is clean, meaning you approriatly make use of classes, structs, enumerators, etc..

Hmmm... I didn't know DirectInput was faster... That's interesting.